m7_emit_call reimplements call emission and only carried over mem.destroy and
mem.replace, so every mem.create/mem.alloc_slice fell through to the generic
member path and emitted `fe_missing.create(0)`. wcc386 does not diagnose that
-- it terminates with exit 255, which wcl386 reports as "Unable to invoke
wcc386.exe" with no message at all.
The breakage covered all 17 allocation sites in m5/runtime.fe, and it was
invisible because m5-owned and m5-defer only emit C; m5-runtime is the one M5
fixture that compiles and links what was generated.
Also make runtime.fe legal: `run` used `try` while returning i32, which SPEC
allows only in a function returning an error union. It is `-> !i32` now, which
M7 accepts because contextual success construction lands with it, and
runtime.c takes the { error, value } struct the error union lowers to.
Found by calling wcc386 directly instead of through wcl386, which is the only
way to see a compiler crash here.
M1-M7: 183 passed.
SPEC.md allows `try` only inside a function returning an error union, but
check.c only tests it in the FE_N_EXPR_STMT case, so `var x = try e;` and
`x = try e;` walk straight past. m5/owned.fe and m5/runtime.fe both depend on
that gap.
Moving the check onto the try expression is a four-line change and it is
correct, but it cannot land yet. runtime.fe's `run` allocates and returns a
value, so closing the hole forces it to return an error union -- and master
rejects `return <value>;` in `-> !i32` ("return type mismatch") as well as a
bare `return;` in `-> !void` ("void expression returned from value function").
Both need contextual success construction, which is M7 work. `catch` and
`@trap()`, the two spellings SPEC offers as alternatives, are also M7-only, so
there is no way to express `run` legally on master today. All three paths were
tried in DOSBox-X, not assumed.
Fix owned.fe now, since `main() -> !void` is legal today and matches
m4/try-fpr.fe, and leave the checker alone until M7 lands with the rest.
Verified: 155 passed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BScg8CF1sAAM2zVHAu5zvW
The bounds-no-checks cases emitted and built but never ran, so they only
proved that --no-checks produces compilable C -- not that it removes the
check, which is the entire point of the flag.
A run case could not simply be appended. BOUNDS.FE returns the out-of-bounds
element directly, so with checks removed its exit code is whatever sits past
the array on the stack and there is no correct status to assert. Asserting on
the generated C instead does not work either: emit_c.c defines fe_trap_bounds
unconditionally and --no-checks only suppresses the call sites.
Add NOCHK.FE, which reads one element past a [2]i32 and returns x - x. That
is 0 for whatever garbage the unchecked read produced, so the same source has
a defined outcome both ways: compiled with checks it must trap, compiled with
--no-checks it must run to completion and exit 0. Register both halves and
drop the two BOUNDS-N cases they supersede.
Verified in DOSBox-X: 155 passed, including m3-nochk-trap failing as expected
and m3-nochk-off-run succeeding.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BScg8CF1sAAM2zVHAu5zvW
조건부 이동, 이중 destroy, 직접 drop 호출에 대한 실패 fixture를 추가하고
runtime harness와 test-dos.bat를 그에 맞춰 갱신한다.
M5는 아직 완료가 아니다. 모든 경로에서 정확히 1회 cleanup, defer/drop의 선언
역순 병합, try 전파 경로 cleanup, MaybeMoved 런타임 live flag, struct drop과
필드 역순 drop, 분기/루프 상태 합류, 누수/이중해제 카운터 harness가 남아 있다.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_012PQm6oAvWX4Lp3iSN5AHGT
coolguy
