Checking the markers for the first time found five disagreements in areas that
are implemented. Four were the marker's fault:
- own/badarg pinned "self", but the rule being broken is that a returned
reference must derive from a parameter -- `self` has nothing to do with it.
- own/badbrmov pinned line 9, which is the closing brace; the second destroy is
on line 8.
- own/badloop pinned line 8, the destroy after the loop. The diagnostic is on
line 6, inside it, and line 6 is right: the second iteration moves the same
value again, so the loop body is where it is caught. Whoever wrote the marker
expected the error after the loop.
- optional/badcatch pinned line 14, the body of the catch block. The catch
expression on line 13 is what cannot fall through.
The fifth was the compiler's. own/badweak assigns a `&mut i32` to a `&i32` and
got "initializer type mismatch", which says nothing about why. Weakening an
exclusive borrow to a shared one is a specific rule and now says so, for
references and slices alike.
own/ is fully green: 50/50. Overall 133 -> 138 of 188. The six remaining marker
disagreements are all under units/ and generic/, where nothing is implemented
yet, so there is no diagnostic to compare against and no way to tell whether
the marker is right.
coolguy
547d8c5ec2